Relational Nouns as Anaphors
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper examines the syntactic and semantic properties of a set of nouns recently called "Relational Nouns" like mother, neighbor, etc. Relational nouns denote relations between individuals, rather than sets of individuals regular nouns denote, and are referentially dependent on individual-denoting expressions. In Japanese relational nouns may appear 'bare' with no genitive possessors in the noun phrases they project, i.e., but still require the possessors somewhere in sentences. The presence of bare relational nouns allow Japanese to have a lot of peculiar constructions like multiple subject sentence, indirect passives, etc. Assuming the a version of categorial grammar in which the syntax and semantics work in tandem, we discuss the proper way to provide model-theoretic interpretations for expressions containing relational nouns under direct compositionality.
منابع مشابه
Context Sensitivity of Relational Nouns
We present findings that relational nouns are more contextsensitive than entity nouns in two conceptual combination recognition tasks. Across two experiments, we investigated people’s ability to recognize entity nouns and relational nouns either in the same context as at encoding or in a different context. We found that (1) participants showed greater recognition sensitivity for entity nouns th...
متن کاملCan Relationality be Distinguished from Abstractness in Noun Mutability?
Previous studies have suggested that relational concepts are more mutable—more prone to change meaning in context— than entity concepts even when both relational and entity concepts are denoted by nouns (Asmuth & Gentner, 2005; Feist & Férez, 2007). However, relationality is a complex dimension, and is highly correlated with other factors such as imageability and abstractness. In the current re...
متن کاملA Corpus-based Study on Abstract Anaphora Resolution
This paper is a corpus-based study on abstract anaphora resolution, especially on classification of anaphors. To get a consistent analysis of abstract anaphors, I propose that NPs denoting abstract entities are possible abstract referents besides other linguistic units claimed in the literature. I claim that the forms of anaphors, especially types of nouns for this N and that N are the first cr...
متن کاملRunning head: RELATIONAL CATEGORIES ARE MORE MUTABLE 1 Relational Categories Are More Mutable than Entity Categories
Across three experiments, we explore differences between relational categories—whose members share common relational patterns—and entity categories, whose members share common intrinsic properties. Specifically, we test the claim that relational concepts are more semantically mutable in context, and therefore less stable in memory, than entity concepts. We compared memory for entity nouns and r...
متن کاملRelational categories are more mutable than entity categories.
Across three experiments, we explore differences between relational categories-whose members share common relational patterns-and entity categories, whose members share common intrinsic properties. Specifically, we test the claim that relational concepts are more semantically mutable in context, and therefore less stable in memory, than entity concepts. We compared memory for entity nouns and r...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004